Skip to main content
All resources
Article18 January 20258 min read

How to Eliminate Manual DA Data Entry: A Council IT Manager's Guide

Practical strategies for council IT managers to automate DA data transfer between the NSW Planning Portal and internal council systems.

Local GovernmentGovernment
How to Eliminate Manual DA Data Entry: A Council IT Manager's Guide

Manual data entry is one of the biggest inefficiencies in council planning departments. When applications arrive through the NSW Planning Portal, staff often spend hours re-keying information into internal council systems. This guide sets out practical ways to remove that bottleneck.

The end point is full integration. Our Local Government Integration page describes how we connect the Planning Portal to your core council system.

The cost of manual data entry

Before you automate, work out what the manual process costs your council today.

Time

For a typical DA, manual entry involves:

  • Applicant details: keying and checking contact records
  • Property information: verifying and entering the property
  • Application specifics: entering the submission details
  • Document handling: downloading, renaming and filing each file

Time each task on a sample of recent applications. Multiply the average by your annual volume to see how much staff time goes on data entry alone.

Errors and rework

Manual entry always produces some errors. Each one has a downstream cost:

  • Incorrect property identifiers need investigation and correction
  • Wrong contact details delay communication
  • Misfiled documents create compliance risk
  • Errors compound as the application moves through workflow stages

An error found late costs far more to fix than one caught at entry.

Staff satisfaction

Repetitive data entry is among the least satisfying parts of planning work. Staff trained in assessment spend time on administration that adds little to their professional development.

Automation opportunities

Several approaches reduce or remove manual entry, from simple process fixes to full integration.

Level 1: Better manual processes

Even without system integration you can reduce the burden:

  • Standard templates: create import templates that match Portal export formats
  • Batch processing: handle applications in groups, not one by one
  • Agreed procedures: set one efficient way to transfer data

These changes help, but staff still handle every application by hand.

Level 2: Semi-automated transfer

Add tools that assist with the transfer:

  • Export and import utilities: extract Portal data and format it for import
  • Document automation: scripts that organise and rename files
  • Validation checks: automatic verification of transferred data

Staff keep oversight of each transfer, but the repetitive work shrinks.

Level 3: Full integration

Complete integration removes manual entry from the routine path:

  • Real-time synchronisation: data flows from the Portal to the council system
  • Two-way updates: status changes appear in both systems
  • Document automation: files transfer and file themselves
  • Exception handling: only anomalies need staff attention

Building the business case

To secure investment, show a clear return.

Quantify current costs

Use your own numbers in this formula:

Annual applications x hours per application x staff hourly cost = annual cost of data entry

As an illustration only, 1,000 applications a year at 1.5 hours each and $45 an hour (including on-costs) gives $67,500 a year.

Estimate the savings

Savings depend on how much of that time integration removes in your council. Test the assumption in a pilot rather than taking a vendor's figure. Other benefits are harder to price but real:

  • Fewer errors: less correction and rework
  • Faster processing: a better applicant experience
  • Staff time: available for higher-value work
  • Compliance: consistent data handling

Payback

Compare projected savings with integration costs to find your payback period. Include licence, delivery and support costs in the comparison.

Implementation approaches

In-house development

Building the integration yourself gives maximum control, but it needs:

  • Developers with API experience
  • Capacity for ongoing maintenance
  • Security and compliance expertise
  • Testing and quality assurance

Best suited to: councils with an established IT development team.

Point solution

Commercial products connect specific systems. They are built for particular platforms and the vendor manages updates, but they offer less flexibility for custom requirements.

Best suited to: councils with a standard configuration and straightforward needs.

Managed integration platform

A managed platform handles all aspects of Portal connectivity:

  • Pre-built connectors for major council systems
  • Hosted infrastructure with managed updates
  • Expert support for configuration and troubleshooting
  • Room for custom workflows

Best suited to: councils that want a quick start with little internal technical overhead.

Data mapping essentials

Accurate mapping between the Portal and your council system is the core of the work.

Core data elements

  • Application ID to reference number: may need a prefix or format change
  • Property address to property identifier: needs address parsing and matching
  • Applicant details to contact records: handle individual and company applicants
  • Submission date to lodgement date: check time zone handling
  • Application type to work type: needs category mapping

Document handling

  • Naming conventions: agree consistent naming rules
  • Type classification: map Portal document types to your categories
  • Version control: handle updated and superseded documents
  • Storage location: decide where documents live

Status synchronisation

  • Map Portal statuses to internal workflow stages
  • Define which status changes trigger synchronisation
  • Handle conflicts and edge cases

Change management

Technical delivery is only part of the job. Staff adoption decides whether it succeeds.

  • Explain the benefits: less repetitive entry, less error correction, more time for assessment
  • Train staff: how to review transferred data, handle exceptions and get support
  • Gather feedback: regular check-ins early on, clear escalation paths and a way to act on suggestions

Measuring success

  • Efficiency: processing time per application and manual entry hours, before and after
  • Quality: data entry error rates, rework incidents and customer enquiries
  • Staff: time on assessment compared with administration, and satisfaction with the process

Getting started

  1. Audit current processes: document existing data entry workflows and time spent
  2. Calculate costs: put the current burden in dollars and hours
  3. Define requirements: identify the data and workflows to automate
  4. Evaluate options: compare in-house, point solution and managed platform
  5. Build the business case: present findings to stakeholders
  6. Plan implementation: set the timeline and resources
  7. Run a pilot: start with a limited scope
  8. Scale and refine: expand based on what the pilot teaches you

With the right approach, your council can reclaim staff time while improving data quality. To discuss your situation, contact our team. You can also read how Shellharbour City Council automated its Planning Portal applications.

Got a project in mind?

Book a free 30-minute consultation. We'll listen and give you a straight answer.

Book a Consultation